<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charging for doc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentroi.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/charging-for-doc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentroi.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/charging-for-doc/</link>
	<description>Technical content and product information in the Web 2.0 era.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:18:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: darryltewes</title>
		<link>http://contentroi.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/charging-for-doc/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>darryltewes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentroi.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike - Thanks for chiming in... I&#039;m intrigued by your post and have lots of questions; such as, Who funded the free bare-naked and enhanced doc projects, respectively? Can you point us to examples? In any event, I hope you&#039;ll visit again soon - thanks for helping move the conversation forward...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike &#8211; Thanks for chiming in&#8230; I&#8217;m intrigued by your post and have lots of questions; such as, Who funded the free bare-naked and enhanced doc projects, respectively? Can you point us to examples? In any event, I hope you&#8217;ll visit again soon &#8211; thanks for helping move the conversation forward&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bradley</title>
		<link>http://contentroi.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/charging-for-doc/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentroi.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Anyone interested in the value of docs should look closely at companies based in the open-source sector. I&#039;ve been working lately for a company that publishes enhanced versions of open source software. Their Pubs dept. sells docs on the free bare-naked open source version of the software and on their added-cost enhanced versions. The dept. is a profit center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone interested in the value of docs should look closely at companies based in the open-source sector. I&#8217;ve been working lately for a company that publishes enhanced versions of open source software. Their Pubs dept. sells docs on the free bare-naked open source version of the software and on their added-cost enhanced versions. The dept. is a profit center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basic tech pubs value proposition &#171; Content ROI</title>
		<link>http://contentroi.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/charging-for-doc/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Basic tech pubs value proposition &#171; Content ROI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentroi.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] tech pubs value&#160;proposition 31Jul08    As I stated in Charging for doc, most tech pubs groups can&#8217;t directly charge, or charge enough, for their products (the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tech pubs value&nbsp;proposition 31Jul08    As I stated in Charging for doc, most tech pubs groups can&#8217;t directly charge, or charge enough, for their products (the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
